The U.N. will receive an anti-spying resolution spear-headed by European and Latin American diplomats in collaboration with other countries in the next week in an effort to protect and expand online confidentiality. In my opinion the anti-spying resolution is more than data protection. It is a contractual boundary promoting transparency indicative of unspoken trust that must be at the forefront of negotiations and collaboration to meet basic shared needs of all countries.
I remember a particular incidence where my trust was ripped
from me as my face grew flush and my stomach contracted with the visceral
reaction of betrayal. In a moment I knew my privacy had been violated. This may
very well be the same gut response German Counselor Angela Merkel had when she
furiously spoke out against spying upon learning the U.S. allegedly monitored
her cell phone through NSA activities.
Brazil’s President Dilma Rousseff is outraged over purported
U.S. surveillance tactics, which she is likening to espionage activity. As
covered by an article in the Huffington Post, monitoring of citizen’s data is protected
under the International Covenant on
Civil and Political Rights, which went into force in 1976. One of the reasons countries
are drafting a U.N. resolution to expand these rights.
In response to
concerns about surveillance the U.S. has justified unnecessary policing
activities as a measure to counter terrorism. This is an odd strategy to say the
least along with the confusing unspoken messages it sends to citizens in the
U.S. and other countries. As a nation we are policing the activities of
countries with whom we have good relations. Data scrubbing is a betrayal of
trust, or indicates the lack thereof, which I believe is at the heart of the
outrage. The theory that if you do not have anything to hide
you will not be concerned about being monitored is a fallacy. Nations are
outraged because being monitored for an ongoing basis sends the message that in
reality we are not ready to collaborate with other countries because at our
core we do not trust them. The U.S. will need to genuinely respond to the
breach of trust and growing frustration
of other countries or risk polarizing them with unwarranted investigations for
potential threats and our lack of shared beliefs in transparency.
Read further here: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/10/26/un-anti-spying-resolution_n_4165470.html?utm_hp_ref=world



